Skip to content

Diaries

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Diaries commented  · 

    Me too!!

    Diaries supported this idea  · 
  2. 38 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Diaries commented  · 

    Many of us have chosen to pay for Microsoft solely because Adobe doesn't support Linux yet. So, the expenses equation becomes: Adobe expenses = Adobe expenses + Microsoft expenses + the inconvenience of not being comfortable.

    Especially nowadays, the development and maintenance have become much easier with universal package managers like Flatpak, Nix (which is a standalone package manager and cross-platform, gaining a good reputation), and Snap (Blender uses this, although this option specifically is not well received by the community); even Debian has started supporting proprietary software from their latest version, Debian 12. These package manager options are all open source, and if any functionalities are lacking, Adobe can consider exploring collaborations or partnerships with the Linux community, benefiting themselves and finding creative solutions that align with their business model. Additionally, such collaborations can contribute to the growth and improvement of the Linux ecosystem, providing a more comprehensive and seamless experience for Adobe users on Linux.

    While there is currently no direct alternative to Adobe on Linux, it's important to note that the Linux app ecosystem is continuously evolving. It's difficult to predict when there might be a shift in the landscape, rendering Adobe's software unnecessary. By embracing Linux now, Adobe can position itself at the forefront of this changing environment and ensure its continued relevance and value to users.

    Alternatively, users can utilize AppImage. Although I don't prefer it, I will use it for the Adobe collection. I don't mind using it for a couple of important apps.

    The Linux user base for desktop is growing, and Linux has matured significantly as a desktop OS over the past years. In fact, it is now better than Windows. Additionally, I believe artists will love the customization options and freedom available for their Linux desktop environment. By exploring possibilities to support Linux, Adobe can tap into a thriving community of artists, designers, and developers who are eager to see their favorite software become accessible on their preferred operating system. It would be an opportunity for Adobe to expand their reach, meet the needs of a diverse user base, and explore new avenues for innovation.

    Overall, I encourage Adobe to consider supporting Linux and explore the possibilities offered by universal package managers and the growing Linux user base. By doing so, they can adapt to the changing landscape, provide enhanced experiences for their users, and explore new opportunities for growth and innovation while maintaining their unique business model and protecting their intellectual property.

    Diaries supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base