Sean Riddolls
My feedback
1 result found
-
998 votes
Thank you for sharing your thoughts—we truly value your feedback! We're excited to invite you to help shape the future of this feature. Would you like to be among the first to experience our early alpha test? Fill out this quick survey to secure your spot and play a crucial role in building something amazing with us. Your input makes all the difference!
https://survey.adobe.com/jfe/form/SV_6fGjEf09Sj4FJSC
An error occurred while saving the comment
The 1:10 scaling is what most of us *already* do to overcome this programmatic shortcoming.
For example, I do condominium floorplans in Illustrator. The average floorplan far exceeds 226 inches in width. So I note that 1 inch in Illustrator = 10 inches in reality. When I create a detailed illustration of a bathtub that measures 60" x 32" – in illustrator I have to scale it down to 6" x 3.2".
However, being able to work in the actual units would be a welcome improvement. (It will also avoid confusion with the architects, builders, contractors, and particularly end-clients as to why their bathtub is designated at only 6 inches long).
Why, the canvas scale cannot be specified programmatically, I do not understand.
Vector illustrations can be scaled infinitely with no resource impact – It shouldn't matter if the virtual canvas size is 226 inches or 226 kilometers.