Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

umar

My feedback

  1. 75 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We have the fix available in the latest release. Please update Illustrator using Adobe Creative Cloud application to the latest build for version Illustrator CC 22.1.
    Please refer to our knowledge base FAQhttps://illustrator.uservoice.com/knowledgebase/articles/1844590 if you face difficulty in update.
    Or get in touch with us at any of the other support channels – https://helpx.adobe.com/support.html

    Warm Regards,
    Ashutosh Chaturvedi | Sr. Quality Engineering Manager – Illustrator
    Adobe. Make It an Experience.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    umar commented  · 

    FOUND THE SOLUTION:

    "There is a checkbox in. Preferences > Selection & Anchor Display > Move Locked and Hidden Artwork with Artboard."

    Comment by dk.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    umar commented  · 

    NOOO, Artboard should Move/Copy Each and Every Asset Present on the Artboard, even if its locked or hidden. Consider the Most Common Scenario, We All Lock Background layer(s) so while Duplicating Artboard, we'll Miss Background layers and Other Assets!

    Means we'll first have to Locate All those Locked layers in thousands of layers to unlock them before coping an Artboard!

    And what's the point to Stick the Locked layers at the Same "X and Y" Position, position is Relative to the Artboard and Other Assets so it should Moved with the Artboard.

    Anyone who don't want to move the locked layers with Artboard can Simply keep locked layers outside the Artboard.

    DUPLICATING ARTBOARD means Duplicate the Complete Artboard!

  2. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    umar shared this idea  · 
  3. 410 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    umar supported this idea  · 
  4. 887 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    umar commented  · 

    There are a Huge PROBLEMS if Working with Scale as listed below:

    1) If used Raster Image, Calculate its Resolution (Proportional to its Physical Position)

    2) If used Repeatable Pattern on Background, and when i am Fully Satisfied with the Pattern Size, i will Sent it for Printer RIP and he will Simply SCALE UP the Pattern 10 TIMES! If i could design at 1:1, i would rather Repeat pattern instead of Scaling.

    3) The Allowed Maximum Size is TOO SMALL that we cannot even Design at Scaled Ratio of 1:10 and 1:12, which is usually Required by Printers and Easy to Calculate.

    umar supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base