Release to Layers should inherit custom names from original objects
When I Release to Layers, all of the objects within that layer are renamed to "Layer 1, Layer 2, Layer 3" etc. and I'd love to be able to have the new layers be named the same as when they were objects.
-
Dan Wilde commented
I know this post was suggested 6 years ago but this is still a desperately needed feature. Please Adobe, can we get this update to illustrator. I know there was a script floating around a few years ago but that no longer works and most people couldn't get it to work on mac. It would mac life so much easier.
-
Dani Griffin commented
Most wanted!
-
Sarah commented
Yes, please Adobe!!
-
Alek commented
Hi guys, this feature would be super handy
-
jsomerfield commented
This is much needed
-
weccleston commented
Over the course of the last 20 years, I suspect this would've saved me at least 1000 hours. Let's make it happen before I retire please : )
-
Anonymous commented
How is this not implemented yet? Such a common pain point and part of a necessary work flow.
-
Nazeko Art commented
This will totally help cut the file management time in half tbh
-
Chris commented
When prepping files to move from Illustrator to After Effects, I frequently have to release everything to layers and then rename all the layers.
It would streamline this process immensely I could rename, say, Groups, or Paths, or whatever element I'm using while everything is still in one layer and then have the Release To Layers command automatically inherit those names for the layers when they are created.
If they didn't have custom names, it would create a layer as normal.
-
Natasia Noble commented
It's September! Please implement this :(
-
Anonymous commented
YESSSSS
-
Anonymous commented
PLEASE!!!
-
Truman commented
Yes. PLEASE IMPLEMENT THIS.
-
Konrad commented
Agreed. Would really speed up the workflow.
-
Anonymous commented
Completely agree, this is much needed
-
Anonymous commented
Currently, when one uses the "Release to Layers" command, all naming on the groups is removed and the resulting layers are renamed rather unhelpfully as Layer 2, Layer 3, etc. In addition, these new "Layers" are kept as sub-layers of the orignal layer which, when working with complex artwork, can be quite confusing. The current functionality completely invalidates good organizational practices and actually punishes any attempt at naming conventions when needing to prepare artwork for other applications (such as After Effects).
Ideally, when "Release Layers to Sequence" is performed, the naming already in place on the selected groups or objects would be RETAINED, rather than being inexplicably discarded. In addition, since the entire purpose of releasing to layers is to create NEW layers, these would automartically become top-level layers, rather than sub-layers of the original layer. Or perhaps an option could be included to retain current layer structure.
This would be extremely valuable for working between Illustrator and After Effects, as After Effects only recognizes top-level Illustrator layers as individual After Effects layers. The reality is that artwork received for animation is often not optimized for importing into After Effects, which means wasted time in prepping artwork for use between two applications which should have much greater interoperability (as is clearly possible as evidenced by the functionality introduced by the 3rd part script Overlord). Many Illustrator artists will use tons of subgroups that may very well function better as individual layers in After Effects, but the prep work invbolved currently is less than optimal given the current functionality of "Release to Layers."