AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
My feedback
6083 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment While this is not done, you can try to use scripts by Nimbling:
https://github.com/nimbling/Nimbling_Scripts#clip-scripts
I have wrapped them in actions and assigned to hotkeys, they work pretty fine, although not like the dragging from Affinity or Move Inside / Outside commands...AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
56 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment But make it an option, because current default way is also can be useful. But not often :D
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment You mean you want to see only one gradient annotator for several objects selected, if they share the same gradient?
There was the opposite request, to have them separated, and this is why we have this behaviour now. Can you please give some examples where it makes your workflow harder? -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment It looks a lot like a paid plugin DynamicSketch by AstuteGraphics.
There are videos at YouTube with demonstrations.
Is is close enough to what you want? -
3 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment All three are definitely needed for those who construct rather than draw, true.
There are some paid tool wo do that, by AstuteGraphics (ExtendPath, Trim and Join) and RJGraffix (Trimmer). Corner tool is something that still can be done manually with extending and trimming after though.AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
shared this idea
·
-
34 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment While Adobe hesitates implementing this, use this amazing free script form Sergey Osokin to rename layers, artboards, objects, anything — at once, with a lot of features:
https://github.com/creold/illustrator-scripts/blob/master/md/Artboard.md#batchrenamer
So cool. Why don’t we have it from the box already? -
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Document Info panel can display the number of selected objects, if you choose 'Objects' in the panel’s menu.
However, it counts all low-level objects only (for example, if I have 3 boxes, and 2 of them are grouped, it will count 3 only, and won’t tell details), does not remember the choice between launches, and is pretty useless with Global Edit (by design).
So yeah, this is a solid request.
AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment I like it a LOT.
I have to Ctrl+X and Ctrl+F to simulate this in very inefficient way. -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment I like the idea!
But since it’s a mode, which is not very clear when turned on, I am a bit afraid of having it. It can bring a lot of confusion, so it should be marked clearly.Meanwhile, there is an easy enough workaround. If you isolate and object, the newly created object will be placed just above it, because you limit the scope. If you assign a hotkey to isolating a selection (it’s blank by default), you effectively create a mode by pressing it.
Please comment back if it works for you.
AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment ...and back!
AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment It happens with or without the Rubber band
An error occurred while saving the comment I confirm that with version 26.3.1
Once you delete the line from Layers, Illustrator offers you to complete the segment with the rubber band, bound to an already deleted point. Once you click, the line gets restored, and undoing it several step back makes Illustrator go unresponding.AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment OK, this is interesting.
Please download the two more images I attach.
~LINE_032.png is saved form Photoshop using Save for Web and devices.
~~LINE_032.png is saved from Photoshop using plain Save As.Now please go to https://www.nayuki.io/page/png-file-chunk-inspector which allows to inspect the written structure of an uploaded PNG and study all 3 images we have (better do it in three tab copies).
Then also open https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-png-961001 and search for 'Physical pixel dimensions' (chapter 4.2.5), where you can see what are we looking at in those PNG’s chunks.
Resolution is an arbitrary. As the standard says, it can be unspecified and unknown.
The original image (no tilde) has the both resolution parameters set to 1ppi (!) — which is exactly what Ai is reading, but the unit specifier is set to 0, which means 'the actual size of the pixels remains unspecified'.
Which perhaps means AE writes the lowest possible resolution and then says 'but we don’t know'.The second image, from the built-in ImageReady module from Save for Web, gives no resolution specified.
The third image honestly says it’s 2835ppi and in print it should be 72dpi (DPI and PPI are different monsters).
So, Photoshop puts a lot of metadata in the file, including resolution, XMP, etc.
Save for Web method does not care about resolution an image has. Who cares, browsers display pixels, and scaling is usually controlled externally by web designers. When an image without a resolution specified is read by Photoshop, it ASSUMES it has the default 72ppi.
Why AE writes 1ppi? Why Photoshop ignores it and why Illustrator decides to not to? Why it started doing this inly recently? Pretty interesting, right? Yes, I’ve seen these 1ppi images before, and just recently I had plenty of them — and they were not from AE — and Ai refused to place them too.
Thanks for reporting this, I'll try to push it further form the Ai side. If you find time to also ask AE team about their 'sequential resolution decisions' — it’d be great.
An error occurred while saving the comment Something is definitely wrong.
Can you please generate one image for testing and share it here? -
1 vote
You can tweak the double click speed in Windows settings or disable 'Double Click To Isolate' option in Illustrator’s Preferences > General.
An error occurred while saving the comment Welcome back :)
An error occurred while saving the comment Stéphanie, it’s because the Windows settings for the speed of double click. If you make the allowed pause shorter, Ai will stop misfiring Isolation mode — but it’d be harder for you to double-click elsewhere.
I personally suffered from this for a while, before I realized I can tweak it, since I'm fast enough to do quick double-clicks... and also I learnt to wait a bit before setting a key :)As a workaround you can disable 'Double Click To Isolate' option in Preferences > General.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Can’t reproduce yet. After expanding sprayed symbols all the way down I am still able to convert the group I get into a Repeat object.
Perhaps it’s something with the symbol used?
Can you please share the text file with the one you used here in comments? -
2 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
Jane, you have to expand your request.
You say panels for working with color are simpler in InDesign.
One can object they are way to simple. Another will respond they are quite similar. What is obvious to you can be viewed from a different point of view by others.
What is difficult? What elements are not necessary? Why? What do they miss? Can you give examples of your workflows in Ai and InD and compare efforts?