AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
My feedback
7122 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment So you want for this tool to have parameters similar to the effect, Size, Point Type? Detail is already there...
My main problem with Wrinkle is that the details it makes are not relative to the path, the angle is absolute.
But I’m not sure I get what you mean still, please elaborate.An error occurred while saving the comment It already has it. It’s called Wrinkle Tool, and its’ usually located within the Warp Tool tool group (if you are using the Advanced tool panel).
Press Enter when the tool is picked to call the tools’ options (this works for almost each tool Ai has).
The difference between the effect and the tool is that an effect is a parametric modification — it gets applied to the whole object, and can later be edited, from the Appearance panel, as a modifier / node. The tool actually modifies a path on canvas, guided by the user input, baking the result immediately.
Does it work for you? -
2 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment I can guess this is a consequence of the fixed bug live shapes had... when grouped, Ai treated the resulting group as live shape, calculating the size wrong (http://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/601447/suggestions/42164089) AND exposing the controls over children as a side effect...
This is controversial... Ai paradigm is 'all children selected means the parent object is selected' (this is why this request exists, to let us see the point controls for a path even when it’s fully selected, — http://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/333657/suggestions/48962273)
I understand that was useful, but I doubt this can be introduced back... After all, this was not perfect even then — if the selection had any other non-rectangle object within, Ai showed no rectangle-specific controls. And this logic works here — when you select a group, you also have the group itself selected, and it’s not a rectangle :)
What I don’t agree with though — if I isolate a group with only rectangles in it, selecting all inside should show the rectangle-specific controls! Selecting all in a box should mean selecting the box, while we IN the box... So I upvote THIS. -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Phillip, it is broken in Beta for me only.
Can you confirm GA build works fine for you?AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment I confirm. The dropdown won’t drop...
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Circumscribed VS Inscribed. One is there and the other one is not...
The workaround that can be used is to convert it to a rectangle instead and apply a Round Corners effect with a large value. Expanding it though won’t give us a real ellipse, and using Object > Shape > Convert to Shape won’t work in most cases (unless the width / height values are truly equal)...
Another solution would be to use the Dynamic Shapes plugin tool, it recognizes these imported circles better.AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris, Adobe can’t merge these. UserVoice is a third-party service, and it has its own rules.
If you don’t agree with this — please make a user request from THEM: feedback.uservoice.com/forums/1-general-feedback (I searched for existing one and didn’t find it)
But yes, it’d require you to create a new login for that particular domain :)An error occurred while saving the comment There is a separate request for that, here at UV: https://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/333657-illustrator-desktop-feature-requests/suggestions/45951838-make-a-more-integrated-way-to-report-bugs
Do you mind me merging this request of yours with an older one?AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesAdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
GPU Preview glitches with clipping masks and transparency (since Illustrator 29.6.0), white rectangle appears below
-
Screen%20Recording%202025-11-24%20at%2015.06.44.mov 10658 KB -
Screenshot%202025-10-16%20at%205.40.03%E2%80%AFPM.png 1353 KB -
Screenshot%202025-10-16%20at%205.39.54%E2%80%AFPM.png 1123 KB -
Screenshot%202025-09-11%20at%2012.32.56.png 213 KB -
Screenshot%202025-08-07%20at%2010.11.11%E2%80%AFAM.png 2844 KB -
exhibit_error.ai 9184 KB -
Screenshot_while_using_CPU.png 3953 KB -
Screenshot_while_using_GPU.png 4910 KB -
Screenshot%202025-07-30_clipping%20mask%20bounding%20box%20knockout%2003.png 174 KB -
Screenshot%202025-07-30_clipping%20mask%20bounding%20box%20knockout%2001.png 209 KB -
Screenshot%202025-07-30_clipping%20mask%20bounding%20box%20knockout%2002.png 209 KB -
problem%20ai.png 244 KB -
Screenshot%202025-07-23%20alle%2009.10.17.png 1502 KB -
Screenshot%202025-07-23%20alle%2009.08.19.png 1907 KB -
Screenshot%202025-07-23%20alle%2009.08.04.png 1701 KB -
ClippingIssue.mov 2778 KB -
20250709-ClippingTransparency.mov 29432 KB -
Screenshot%202025-06-24%20at%201.00.34%E2%80%AFPM.png 518 KB -
Screenshot%202025-06-24%20at%201.00.13%E2%80%AFPM.png 431 KB -
Screenshot%202025-06-24%20at%2012.59.33%E2%80%AFPM.png 598 KB
24 votesWe have fixed this issue and the fix is available in the latest Illustrator Beta app - v 30.0.0.114
Please give it a try and share your observations. We are going to ship this in general availability builds soon.
An error occurred while saving the comment Sure, I get it... something has changed between the build obviously....
The team has been informed.
I wonder if this bug stays when you try to export an image?An error occurred while saving the comment Checked this on Intel i7 4470 3.4GHz, RAM 24GB, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050Ti — behaves fine for me... making one gradient stop semitransparent doesn’t make white background behind clip group. Perhaps it’s something GPU-specific.
An error occurred while saving the comment 'Blank square'? Please show how it looks (both the object on canvas and its location in the Layers panel).
If possible — share the file here. Add more details: when it happens? What kind of objects does this affect? -
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Oh yes, I get it.
Not sure what kind of visual degradation Ai could offer to boost rendering, other than text greeking (we once had it, and the request to bring it back is here to upvote: http://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/333657/suggestions/32403922)An error occurred while saving the comment @Sa, there is a similar request on preview quality — http://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/333657/suggestions/34245136 — but it’s about raster images specifically. Do you mean the same, or do you mean the overall preview quality, including text, vectors?
AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 'Similar stuff’? Perhaps it’s time to show some stuff you intend to create? :)
There won’t be a dedicated tool to create 'a red mug with cappuccino' (well, there is one, but it seems like text-to-vector doesn’t suite you) — tools in Ai operate on a more basic level, with primitives, to cover the larger area, to fit everyone’s need, and not only medical students. A general approach.As an example — 'molecular cluster tool'. According to the image, it’s just a bunch of circles, connected with perpendicular lines. There is no tool that would instantly build something like this, but there is Perpendicular Tool form Astute Graphics (https://docs.astutegraphics.com/subscribe/perpendicular-line-tool) to connect circles and Snap to Collision tool (https://docs.astutegraphics.com/colliderscribe/snap-to-collisions-tool) to arrange the circles with a given distance.
So — share some images already. What do you need to create?
An error occurred while saving the comment Christian :) These are icons, generated by a multimodal LLM. I bet the same applies to the text of your original request.
Most of the things depicted can be done with existing tools Ai has, effects (appearance, graphic styles).
Wobbly line of the 'Organic blob'? It’s Zig Zag + Round Corners ('membranud', heh)
Cell chains and pseudopods? It’s a popular 'metaball' method, a compound shapes with double Offset Path applied.
Cell textures, tissues? Patterns.
Brush an veins can be done with brushes.
All these require some setup and work.But unless you share some ACTUAL images, examples, you intend to produce, instead of hallucinated ones... I suggest using LLMs further :)
I’d really want to help, but I can’t help a robot.An error occurred while saving the comment Christian, this is an extremely narrow and quite dense package of requests...
Some plugin tools out there exist to help you with some of these, but I’m not a biologist and I can’t be sure these could help you based on text definitions only. I bet none from the team is a biologist as well. Please provide images to support your request. -
1 voteNeed More Info · 2 comments · Illustrator (Desktop) Feature Requests » Performance, Enhancements · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Please send one to sharewithai@adobe.com
What about Ai Beta? Previous builds? -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whenever this happens, check the Keyboard Increment value in Preferences > General. Since it’s the first focused field in the dialog, it’s quite easy to accidentally change in on opening it, especially with Magic Mouse... I’ve seen numerous reports about this getting set to 0,0001 pt (it can’t be set to 0), and this makes objects virtually 'immovable'.
I’m not sure if this is how this gets reset, sure, but that would be my guess. -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment There is a workaround we can use today, using amazing BatchRenamer script by Sergey Osokin: https://github.com/creold/illustrator-scripts/blob/master/md/Artboard.md#batchrenamer
The script can rename your artboards using additional prefixes/suffixes, baking these in names.AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rob, based on the swatches in Swatches, this document, while being an RGB one, was created in CMYK color mode initially.
This means Black is CMYK 0-0-0-100. And K100 is lighter than RGB 0-0-0 (with my current Coated FOGRA39 profile it gives 29-29-27 when converted to RGB).
Color intent is extremely important. It defines defaults and dictates conversion rules for grayscale. If you convert each stop from being a gray tint into RGB — it will start matching. Same happens if you changed the color mode of your document back to CMYK.
However, the problem with lighter gray conversion indeed exists, and this case is only one consequence of it... I will merge this with a larger report.AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Yes!
And this is also why probably shades in Color Guide look very much different for CMYK and RGB (but that’s my guess).
I have no idea when it started and should run some tests to figure this out.
Ton, do you have any memories on this? -
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Very odd!
If I make a full copy of the main clip group itself — only one object vanishes after cleanup, in the original, but not in the duplicate.
If I expand the compound shape — it won’t vanish as well. Releasing it makes unpainted hieroglyphs (and the gradient fill is applied to the compound shape itself) — but this doesn’t explain why only one duplicate gets affected!
Good catch.AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Indeed. The group of no-stroke, no-fill objects has an appearance applied, but for some reason illustrator ignores it and treat them as objects without appearance.
A bug!Meanwhile, try to avoid these :) Apply the style to the compound path itself, on the lowest level of hierarchy and ditch the group. Still it should work, I agree.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Doesn’t happen anymore. Fit to Artboard now ALWAYS includes preview bounds. The problem is that in some cases this is now needed, and we don’t have control over the behavior. Therefore this request exists: http://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/333657/suggestions/46067539
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rob, it behaves as expected now for me (as much as I expect this 'gradient' to behave). Can you confirm this?
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Indeed. Freeform gradient is secretly a live triangular mesh, clipped within a path.
If you expand it, the mesh gets 'baked' and the true bounds become evident. Ai seems to ignore the bounds of the clipping path in this case, sadly... there was a similar bug, now resolved (http://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/601447/suggestions/39669865), but this case slipped through.
Thanks for the report!AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Illustrator now honors raster effects such as clipped shadows, and fits to clipping masks instead of their clipped content, when using Fit to Artwork Bounds or Fit to Selected Art commands.
However, there is no option to not do that, and to ignore Use Preview Bounds option in general — the fitting always uses strokes. If you want to change that, vote here: https://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/333657-illustrator-desktop-feature-requests/suggestions/46067539-an-option-to-ignore-strokes-when-using-fit-to-artw
An error occurred while saving the comment Still a problem for freeform gradients (secretly dynamic triangular meshes), as reported here:
http://illustrator.uservoice.com/forums/601447/suggestions/50062350 -
6 votes
Fix is available in version 29.7.1
AdminEgor Chistyakov
(Admin, Adobe Illustrator)
supported this idea
·
...but why not use the effect then? Apply and expand appearance, quick enough.... you get a similar dialog when applying an effect. Or do you want to control the 'roughness' with the mouse? or is it about the accessibility, one click VS ~3?
In other words — WHY do you want it? :)