Skip to content

Ton

My feedback

385 results found

  1. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Outer Glow works as expected on Mac with 30.1, but Inner Glow shows the bug.

    Ton supported this idea  · 
  2. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton shared this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  5. 56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  6. 39 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    That should be the default in non CJK versions

  8. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton shared this idea  · 
  9. Wrong exported image size (extra pixel added) if artboard coordinates are non-integer, not pixel-perfect

    188 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This issue is probably happening because the artboard dimensions are not appropriate for raster export (i.e. are in decimals).
    If you make x and y values as the whole numbers in the transform panel (not in decimal), then the extra pixels will not be added to the exported image.

    That is the workaround, and it’s reported that it’s not always the case.

    At the same time — Ai knows the size of artboards to be exported and yet it does not deliver the set sizes, which is not fair. The team is going to rethink the algorithm.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    @Ruud, these sizes do indeed result in nice round pixel results.
    It is easy to calculate if your artboard size will generate extra pixels.
    Just divide the lenght of a side by 72 and multiply by the export resolution.
    If the result is a round value, no additional pixels will be generated.
    Your example: 2880÷72=40. 40x300=12000 pix
    2160÷72= 30. 30x300=9000 pix
    Will result in nice round values.
    But 2800 x 2200 would give:
    2800÷72=38,88888889. 38,88888889x300=11666,66666667.
    2200÷72=30,55555556. 30,55555556x300=9166,66666667.
    The fractional results will give additional pixels.
    Resolutions that are multiples of 72 ppi will result in nice round values.
    2800÷72=38,88888889. 38,88888889x288=11200.
    2200÷72=30,55555556. 30,55555556x288=8800.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Jason, the same is also true for objects outside the artboard. If the object upper left X/Y position contains fractional pixels it will add additional pixels.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Even artbords that were perfectly aligned will land on fractional pixel coordinates with the new 29.6 rearrange behaviour.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    The new rearrange artboards feature in 29.6 causes all artboards to be off the pixelgrid.
    You need to click to define the position and that it always off.
    In previous versions using rearrange artboards would fix artboards that were not aligned.
    Try this file in an older version and in the 29.6 version.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    To Dridd,
    I totally agree, this should be fixed, I was just trying to describe how to avoid it.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    To Dridd
    Units should be points or pixels. The rulers need to be global rulers and the artboards x/y coordinates should be measured from a corner (upper left). Artboard Rulers can give the false impression of being aligned to the global pixel grid resulting in additional pixels.

    Ton supported this idea  · 
  10. 57 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  11. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Illustrator makes no difference between a 72 ppi image that is scaled 50% to 144 ppi and an unscaled 144 ppi image. Both are reported as scaled 50%.
    InDesign gives better info, it shows the original, Actual ppi and the Effective ppi and the scale percentage when the user has scaled the image.
    It would be more accurate and better for the consistency between apps if Illustrator would show the same info.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    In Illustrator 2026 (30.0), the behaviour is consistent.
    All file types linked or embedded, layer or flat are showing a scale percentage when their resolution is other than 72 ppi. Images with a 72 ppi resolution are shown as 100%.

    Ton shared this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    An additional observation in 30.0, when the image is drag and dropped it is linked when it is then embedded, it changes color (the numbers are used).
    When the image is drag and dropped while holding the Shift key, it will automatically be embedded, but does not change (much) color (it is converted)
    So you can end up with 2 times the same embedded image that look different.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    This is improved in the beta 30.1 89 The behaviour is correct when embedding it converts to the current document profile, but the dialog is wrong. It is still the same dialog as when you are placing the file. It should tell you to Convert (preserve color appearance).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Both versions give the same Embedded Profile Mismatch dialog when placing the image.
    The 2025 gives it twice, the same dialog during placing and embedding.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    It is shown on embedding. So actually both dialogs are confusing. In 2024 it says paste when it is placed, but gives you the right choices and in 2025 it does not convert when it asks to use the embedded profile (it actually ignores the profile and uses just the numbers).

    Ton shared this idea  · 
  13. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    What happens if you check the Match Print Colors checkbox?

  15. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton shared this idea  · 
  16. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Seems solved in 2025 version 30.0

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Yes, as Egor mentioned, Live Shapes without strokes.
    As a workaround: Object > Shape > Expand Shape

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    And it sometimes works and does not work with the same (user defined dragged and existing) pattern in a single document.

    Ton supported this idea  · 
  17. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Should be a gray.

    Ton supported this idea  · 
  18. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  19. 23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ton supported this idea  · 
  20. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ton commented  · 

    Fixed in version 2026 30.0

← Previous 1 3 4 5 19 20

Feedback and Knowledge Base